Bitstamp insults its customers at every stage: pop-up spam, cookie "consent" bullshit

Bitstamp seems determined to stop a logged-in customer (after going thru the ordeal of logging in [1]) doing the things they need to do, instead distracting them and obstructing them with web-page-foreground-spam.

[1] <https://wibblement.blogspot.com/2022/03/bitstamp-and-ebay-both-insult-their.html>

In this case, there are two foreground spams to deal with before the customer can try to remember what they were actually trying to do, and then try to actually do it.  One is about "Stake your ETH", the idea of staking being unsound, and ETH being a scamcoin.  Even if it were not a scam, the foreground-spam would be unwelcome.  The other is cookie consent spam, thanks to the EU cookie directive.  You don't have to have it, if you only use essential cookies.  It's a big degradation of service to have it.


This is how everyone thinks you design web sites.  If there is a function, it must be hidden under multiple layers of spam, and the user must fight at every stage to move towards what they're trying to do, dismissing this, and "consenting" to that at every stage.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

the persistent idiocy of "privileged ports" on Unix

google is giving more and more 500 errors

7 minute workout: a straightforward audio recording (and two broken google web sites)